Your columns about reverse home mortgages have me interested. I recently retired and discover myself with a paid-up $100,000 house. I also have money and Individual retirement accounts worth over $2 million. Now I wantwish to transfer to a location where real estate is far more expensive.Would it make sense– or be possible– to purchase a$700,000 house with $400,000 down and get a reverse home loan to assist spend for the house? Would there be an advantage in that for me? I truly do not desire to deplete my nest egg by $700,000 to buy a home. What ought to I do?DB By any step

I understand of, you have less money committed to shelter than manythe majority of our population. So it is completely reasonable for you to consider owning a house that is more importantbetter than $100,000.

If you are at least 62, you might buy a $700,000 house using a purchase-money reverse mortgage. It would require a deposit of about $350,000. And you would never ever make a home mortgage payment. So yes, you can do that.But prior to you

do, analyze the ramifications and consider your other income sources. Today you’re living in a house that most likely has out-of-pocket yearly expenses of about $5,000, despite the fact that it has no mortgage. When you move into a $700,000 house, the annual operating costs will be substantially higher, maybe $28,000.

So you’ll be enhancing your shelter, however you’ll likewise be compeling a significant reduction– at least $23,000– of what you could spend for other living costs. The real decrease in spending power after shelter will be higher because you’ll have dedicated about $250,000 of your financial investments (in addition to the equity from your present home) to genuine estate.Another expense

you might not have actually considered is that providing a $700,000 house includes an excellent offera bargain more than furnishing a $100,000 home. You can get a concept by going to with an interior designer and asking what the window treatments for a $700,000 home might cost. Believe me, the response will be sobering.In completion, it

‘s everything about your individual priorities, so you’ll require to do the numbers thoroughly prior to you make this huge of a shift.After reading your columns about reverse home mortgages, I want to offer a factor not to get one. An associate got a reverse home loan when she remained in her 70s. She has no household, no kids and very minimal funds. She believed she was doing the best thing to ensure that she would have a placebelong to live till she died.She is now in her 90s and is not physically able to take care of herself. The reverse home mortgage company has charged a lot interest that she is now upside-down on her house. She couldn’t pay back the home mortgage company, so she has no possession to sell to put herself into a nursing housea retirement home or hire caretakers. It is a really dangerous scenario she discovers herself in.I believe this is the kind of thing that ought to be explained when people are thinking about reverse home mortgages.

People have the tendency to forget that they might not have the ability to take care of themselves in their own houses till the day they die.SH, Dallas You’re totally right about your acquaintance’s present dilemma. However believe for a moment about the circumstances

under which

it might have exercised much better. One solution would have been for her to die much younger. Another would be to go to a nursing house much previously. In either occasion, the house might have been offered and the continuing to be equity– a lot if her departure happened quickly enough– could have been used to cover nursing house costs or been paid out to heirs.Instead, she lived manyseveral years, independently, in a house she wantedwished to remain in. Having a reverse mortgage didn’t trigger her to live too long. Having a reverse home mortgage didn’t cause her to stay too healthy. But having a reverse mortgage did assist her enjoy her self-reliance for numerous years.The issue here isn’t really the tool; it’s that she has lived longer than her house equity could support. That can happenoccur with or without a reverse mortgage.Reverse home mortgages are a financial tool. They are not a complimentary lunch.Scott Burns

is a syndicated columnist and a principal of the Plano-based financial investment firm AssetBuilder Inc. Email concerns to scott@scottburns.com.Twitter: @assetbuilder