The very first huge difference in between today and the 2008 period
prior to the monetary crisis is that personaleconomic sector balance sheets
are far healthier. 2008 wasnt a banking crisis or a financial
crisis. It was a credit crisis. This distinction is vitalis very important
because it was the surge in private credit that led straight to
expensive houses which resulted in Wall Street securitizing those financial obligations.
In essence, we had take advantage of on top of leverage. And when the
product supporting all that take advantage of (housing) collapsed it resulted in
a domino impact. The credit markets today are far healthier than
they were in 2008 and not directly connected to an unmanageable
booming market in the most essential product in the privateeconomic sector
balance sheet (homes).

Personal debt to GDP has actually come way down in recentover the last few years:

Business financial obligation has jumped in current years, however as a percentage
of GDP, it has also declined given that 2007:

Family financial obligation as a portion of GDP has dropped pretty
significantly:

Obviously, government financial obligation has risen and offset much of this
deleveraging, but routine readers know that we do not need to worry
too much about the capacity for the US government to go bankruptdeclare bankruptcy.
So that quantity of financial obligation is far less worrisome and destabilizing
than the privateeconomic sectors financial obligations.

Labor Markets Are Far Healthier

Despite the chaos abroad, the United States economy appears to keep
chugging along. Yes, growth isn’t terrific and I still think were
muddling through from the financial crisis, however its still not as
bad as some make it out to be. In 2008, the essential domino was housing.
As soon as the real estate domino tipped, it caused widespread job cuts. You
may not keep in mind, however the labor market in 2008 was extremely bad. In
reality, the joblessness rate had been increasing since 2006. The credit
crisis was like a sluggish motion train wreck that in fact unfolded
throughout numerous years. This does not from another location appear like
todays labor market.

Out of work claims are near lowest levels:

In 2008, we were 8 months deep in consecutive job losses. Wed.
lost approximately virtually 75K jobs monthly when the monetary.
crisis struck in August 2008. This time around we have yet to see a.
unfavorable month. In truth, 2015 is forming up to be among the much better.
work years of the recovery.

The Banking System is Far Healthier.

By late 2007 and mid 2008, banks credit default swaps were.
rising and numerous had currently blown out to tape highs. The biggest.
banks in the UNITED STATE were all seeing considerable moves in CDS well.
before the panic struck in 2008. Today, there has been essentially no.
change:

Its also worth keeping in mind that the regulations that were put in.
location following the crisis have led to much higher capital ratios.
US banks have a much bigger cushion for downside than they carried out in.
2008.

More 1998 than 2008.

What this environment does appear like is 1998. 1998 was an.
emerging market crisis that banged foreign stocks, commodities and.
currencies. But the problems were fairly contained. In truth, the.
U.S.A boomed in 1999. A lot so that stocks surged crazily on.
the platform of worry that 1998 created and led straight to the blow.
off top in the Tech Bubble. Even emerging market stocks made a huge.
return in 1999, as markets realized the panic may be.
overblown.

Of course, the unidentified right here is China. And I don’t understand if anyone.
fully comprehends whats going on with the Chinese economy. But one.
thing is clear. If China is the sluggish motion credit train wreck.
analogous to 2008, then this too need to be relatively contained to.
China and its most interconnected financial partners. And the.
biggest reason why this is likely to be consisted of is because.
Chinas banking system is mainly state had. Remember, the 2008.
crisis didnt truly end until the US government put its full faith.
and credit behind the US banking system. However China currently has this.
in place. Chinas biggest banks wont be allowed to default or even.
come close. In essence, the AIG strategy for China has constantly remained in.
place. Chinas greatest banks aren’t simply too big to fail. They are.
foolproof.

Interestingly, if you take a look at GDP and labor market trends in.
1998, they look strangely comparable to todays environment. While the.
1998 emerging market crisis unfolded, US GDP barely budged. And the.
unemployment rate continued to drive lower into late 1999. At the.
macro level, the emerging market crisis didnt have much effectinfluence on.
the worlds most crucialessential economy.

Its Always Different This Time.

Naturally, its always different this time. No 2 environments.
are exactly alike. And I shouldnt downplay some of the capacity.
risks in the USA at present. There has been a great deal of margined.
purchasing of equities, a buyback sustained bull market, weak economic.
development, and so on. So there are threats out there that might create the.
potential for stock market instability. The truth that stocks fall.
seems to amaze a great deal of people who have actually ended up being utilized to the.
recent stability, but what weve seen so far is little bit more than.
benign market action.

Now, I am certainly no soothsayer. I simply take a look at the world we.
have, evaluate probable outcomes and position myself appropriately. And.
when I look at the macro image, I see this environment as being.
one that looks a lot more like 1998 than 2008. And while that.
doesnt mean we shouldnt fear some downside in financial markets.
and the economy, it likewise does not imply we need to be developing bunkers.
and stacking into gold.

See likewise.
10 REIT Category Leaders Program 17.44 % More Gains.
From 5 Greatest Yield, Lowest Cost As Of September 21, 2016.

on seekingalpha.com